Hoco DI81 Business Wireless BT Folding Keyboard

Regular price €35,00 EUR Sale price €35,00 EUR
Tax included.
Portable Compatible Compact Design
In stock: 5
Description

The Hoco DI81 is a compact and stylish wireless Bluetooth folding keyboard designed for business and travel use. It features a tri-fold design that makes it highly portable, easily fitting into a bag or even a large pocket. The keyboard connects via Bluetooth to a wide range of devices including smartphones, tablets, and laptops, offering smooth and responsive typing. Built-in rechargeable battery ensures hours of usage on a single charge, with USB-C charging support for convenience. Its sleek aluminum alloy body and scissor-switch keys provide a premium feel and efficient typing experience.

Specifications
  • Model: DI81
  • Brand: Hoco
  • Dimensions (Unfolded): Approx. 290 x 98 x 6.5 mm
  • Dimensions (Folded): Approx. 98 x 60 x 15 mm
  • Weight: Approx. 180g
  • Bluetooth Version: 5.1
  • Battery Capacity: 140mAh
  • Charging Time: About 2–3 hours
  • Working Time: Up to 50 hours
  • Standby Time: Up to 90 days
  • Operating Range: Up to 10 meters
Gift Bag Available

Exquisite gift bag to delight

30 Day Returns

Ensure your satisfaction and peace of mind

Happiness Guaranteed

Loved and approved by thousand customers

Delivery

Dispatch within 48 hours of purchase

What's In The Box

  • Hoco DI81 Folding Wireless Bluetooth
    Keyboard
  • USB-C Charging Cable

User Manual



Detailed specification

  • Connectivity: Bluetooth 5.1 wireless technology
  • Compatible Devices: Smartphones, tablets, laptops (iOS,
    Android, Windows, macOS)
  • Folding Design: Tri-fold (three-part folding) for maximum
    portability
  • Material: Aluminum alloy + ABS plastic
  • Keys: Scissor-switch keys for quiet and responsive typing
  • Battery: Built-in 140mAh rechargeable lithium battery
  • Charging Interface: USB Type-C
  • Operating Distance: Up to 10 meters
  • Charging Time: Approx. 2–3 hours
  • Working Time: Approx. 50 hours continuous use

Product comparison